---
title: 59% of Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan Changed Heads, 2002-07
description: A study of 554 established foreign subsidiaries in Japan found 59% changed their head in 2002-2007. After an expatriate head left, margins fell.
image: https://nobusato.jp/hubfs/covers-2026-10/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover-cover-en-2026-10.png
---

[Nobu Sato](https://nobusato.jp/en?hsLang=en)

[Profile](https://nobusato.jp/en/profile?hsLang=en) [Method](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/method?hsLang=en) [Articles](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog?hsLang=en) [Glossary](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/glossary?hsLang=en) [Contact](https://nobusato.jp/en/contact?hsLang=en)

[日本語](https://nobusato.jp/ja/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover)[English](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover)[中文](https://nobusato.jp/zh/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover)

Launching in Japan

In this article

1. [Who is in this number?](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s1)
2. [Do Japan heads really get replaced in year two?](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s2)
3. [Half the handovers were Japanese to Japanese](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s3)
4. [After an expatriate left, margins fell](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s4)
5. [What can head office write down before the appointment?](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s5)

1. [Home](https://nobusato.jp/en?hsLang=en)
2. [Articles](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog?hsLang=en)
3. [Launching in Japan](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/tag/launching-in-japan)

# 59% of Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan Changed Heads, 2002-07

554 foreign subsidiaries, 2002 to 2007

[Nobu Sato](https://nobusato.jp/en/profile?hsLang=en)7 min read

Contents5

1. [Who is in this number?](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s1)
2. [Do Japan heads really get replaced in year two?](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s2)
3. [Half the handovers were Japanese to Japanese](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s3)
4. [After an expatriate left, margins fell](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s4)
5. [What can head office write down before the appointment?](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover#s5)

Head offices treat replacing the Japan head as a fix. The numbers haven't come, so the person must be wrong, and a better person will turn it around. The one large study I could find on this says otherwise. It covers 554 long-established foreign subsidiaries in Japan between 2002 and 2007, so it describes that period and that kind of company. In that sample, when an expatriate head was replaced, the subsidiary's profitability went down afterward. It didn't matter whether the successor was Japanese or another expatriate.

## Who is in this number?

Established foreign companies, and no startups. The researchers are Fabian Froese, then at Korea University, and Ralf Bebenroth of Kobe University. Their data come from Toyo Keizai's directory of foreign-affiliated companies in Japan. The 2012 discussion paper covers 554 subsidiaries and 2,113 firm-year observations, with 521 changes of the top manager between 2002 and 2007.

The paper describes the sample plainly. The average subsidiary had 835 employees, was 29 years old and was about 77% foreign-owned. The analysis needs performance data for three years before and after each succession, which is why the successions are limited to 2002 through 2007.

Two cautions follow. A Japan entity that is two or three years old with a dozen people is not in this data, and I haven't found public statistics that count such entities separately. The data are also twenty years old. Read them for the pattern in that period and that kind of company. Don't read 59% as today's rate.

## Do Japan heads really get replaced in year two?

I couldn't find data that says so. Between 2002 and 2007, 59% of the subsidiaries changed their head at least once and 25% changed more than once. Turn that around: 226 of the 554, about four in ten, recorded no change at all in that period. The paper does not report an average tenure. It only notes that an expatriate's term is usually three to five years.

For comparison, the search firm Russell Reynolds Associates tracks CEO turnover at companies in the major stock indices worldwide. CEOs who left in 2025 had served 7.1 years on average, down from 8.3 years in 2021. The two figures count different things and can't be compared directly. As a rough scale, an expatriate's three to five years is much shorter than a listed-company CEO's tenure, and it still isn't two.

So where does the year-two impression come from? My guess is two clocks that don't line up.

The first clock belongs to the person. In The First 90 Days, Michael Watkins asked more than 200 company CEOs and presidents how long a typical mid-level leader in a new role takes to reach the break-even point, where the value contributed equals the value consumed. Their average estimate was 6.2 months. That is for an ordinary transition, with no change of country or language. Froese and Bebenroth, in an illustrative example of a three-year assignment, assume the first 12 to 18 months go to adjustment. That is an assumption for the example, not a measurement.

The second clock belongs to head office, and it runs on fiscal years. The first full year of Japan numbers lands on the table roughly a year to a year and a half after the person arrived.

Put the clocks together. The first serious review arrives just as the head has finished adjusting and started to produce. I suspect many of the 25% that changed heads more than once in six years stumbled at this point. That is inference. No statistic says it.

Half of all successions were Japanese to Japanese; profitability fell after the two kinds where an expatriate stepped down

521 top manager successions at 554 foreign subsidiaries in Japan, 2002 to 2007, by who replaced whom (%). Froese and Bebenroth (2012, Kobe University RIEB discussion paper), data from Toyo Keizai's directory of foreign-affiliated companies

- Japanese to Japanese261 cases

  50.1%
- Expatriate to expatriate142 cases

  27.3%
- Japanese to expatriate67 cases

  12.9%
- Expatriate to Japanese51 cases, localization

  9.8%

Predecessor was an expatriate: the paper reports lower return on sales after the change

About four in ten subsidiaries kept the same head throughout. After an expatriate stepped down, margins fell.

Figure 1. Of 521 top manager successions at 554 foreign subsidiaries in Japan between 2002 and 2007, 50.1% were Japanese to Japanese, 27.3% expatriate to expatriate, 12.9% Japanese to expatriate and 9.8% expatriate to Japanese; 59% of the subsidiaries changed their head at least once in the six years and 25% more than once (Froese and Bebenroth, 2012).

## Half the handovers were Japanese to Japanese

Of the 521 successions, 261 were Japanese to Japanese and 142 were expatriate to expatriate. In 67 an expatriate replaced a Japanese head. In 51 a Japanese manager replaced an expatriate.

That last kind is what people call localization. It was the rarest, under a tenth. The reverse move, sending someone from headquarters to replace a Japanese head, happened more often.

"Send our own person to open the market, then hand over to a local" is a plan you hear a lot. Among these long-established foreign companies, few had carried it through.

## After an expatriate left, margins fell

In this sample, when an expatriate head was replaced, subsidiary performance declined, whoever the successor was. That is the conclusion of the version the two authors published in the Journal of International Management in 2020. In the 2012 discussion paper, performance is measured as return on sales.

The abstract adds two things. If the subsidiary was already doing badly, a newly sent expatriate may not be able to stop the decline. And replacing an expatriate with a local manager can improve performance, mainly in older subsidiaries.

In the 2012 discussion paper the authors suggest that expatriates on short terms may be short-term oriented, for example holding back investment in R&D and training. My own reading is plainer. The change itself costs something. On the page about [building a Japan entity from zero](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/method-from-zero?hsLang=en) I wrote that replacing a wrongly hired Japan head takes six to twelve months, and the Japan business more or less stops in between. Whatever the last person took a year or more to learn, the next one learns again.

One caution. Companies that are doing badly are the ones most likely to change their head, so poor results afterward can't all be blamed on the change. The paper controls for prior performance, but it is observational data. It shows association.

## What can head office write down before the appointment?

What to look at and when, what Japan can decide on its own, and what the role actually requires. If these are written before the appointment, the year-two review has something to be checked against.

Timing first. What should be visible at 6, 12 and 18 months? For the first year I argue for milestones: how many channel partners are signed, whether there is a first customer case that can be made public, whether the service commitment has been met for several months running. Measure someone who has only just passed break-even by first-year revenue and you will mostly measure disappointment.

Then authority. Up to what amount can Japan approve by itself, and which terms can it negotiate? Put it in numbers. Without that, a review can't tell "didn't do it" from "wasn't allowed to." [Who decides when the boss is away](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/who-decides-when-the-boss-is-away?hsLang=en) belongs on the same page.

Then the role. I think many successions are set up on the day of the appointment. [Promoting your best salesperson to country manager](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/dont-promote-your-best-seller-to-country-manager?hsLang=en) is the standard example. If what the role needs and what the person is good at don't match, two more years won't change the result.

A change at the top also leaves one thing untouched. The habits underneath stay. [What the first five people settled](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/first-five-people-shape-the-next-fifty?hsLang=en) lives on in everyone who remains, and the new head inherits the same organization.

The study is old and it can't tell you whether your Japan head is the right person. What it found, in those companies and those years, is that replacing an expatriate head was not free. The bill arrived as lower margins.

Sources (as of November 2026)

- [Froese & Bebenroth, "Performance Outcome of Leadership Succession at Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan: Does Nationality Matter?" Kobe University RIEB Discussion Paper DP2012-07 (2012)](https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2012-07.pdf)
- [Bebenroth & Froese, "Consequences of expatriate top manager replacement on foreign subsidiary performance," Journal of International Management 26(2), 2020](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2019.100730)
- [Michael D. Watkins, The First 90 Days, Updated and Expanded (Harvard Business Review Press, 2013)](https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/books/first-90-days/)
- [Russell Reynolds Associates, Global CEO Turnover Index, 2025 annual report (average tenure of outgoing CEOs: 7.1 years)](https://assets-prod.russellreynolds.com/api/public/content/rra-global-ceo-turnover-index-report-2025.pdf)

---

Author

[Nobu Sato](https://nobusato.jp/en/profile?hsLang=en)

Launching in Japan, starting with people and systems. I write about building organizations, sales teams and technology organizations in Japan, in English, Japanese and Chinese.

[Profile](https://nobusato.jp/en/profile?hsLang=en)[Contact](https://nobusato.jp/en/contact?hsLang=en)

## More in this column

1. 01[Eigyo Is Not One Job: What a Japanese Sales Title Hides](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/eigyo-is-not-one-job?hsLang=en)7 min
   
   Japan's job classification splits sales (eigyo) into 12 product categories and says nothing on how people sell. Ask ...
2. 02[What Japanese Candidates Don't Ask Chinese Employers](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/what-japanese-candidates-ask-about-chinese-employers?hsLang=en)7 min
   
   In a 2026 Workport survey of 308 users in Japan, 48.0% of those who check reviews had dropped a company over them. ...
3. 03[When Your Direct Team and Resellers Chase One Customer](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/direct-sales-vs-resellers-japan?hsLang=en)7 min
   
   Set rules before your direct team and resellers in Japan collide: deal registration like Dell's 90 days, named ...

[Column guide: Launching in Japan](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/guide-launching-in-japan?hsLang=en) · [Glossary](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/glossary?hsLang=en) · [The method behind the articles](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/method?hsLang=en)

[← All articles](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog?hsLang=en)

## Writing about launching in Japan, in three languages.

[Profile](https://nobusato.jp/en/profile?hsLang=en) [Get in touch](https://nobusato.jp/en/contact?hsLang=en)

Nobu Sato

Writing about launching in Japan, in three languages.

[info@nobusato.jp](mailto:info@nobusato.jp) [Substack](https://nobusato.substack.com)[Newsletter](https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/the-japan-entry-memo-7519750783555518464/)[Medium](https://medium.com/@nobusato5888)[LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/realnobusato/)[X](https://x.com/nobusato5888) [RSS](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/rss.xml?hsLang=en)

[Profile](https://nobusato.jp/en/profile?hsLang=en)[Method](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/method?hsLang=en)[Articles](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog?hsLang=en)[Glossary](https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/glossary?hsLang=en)[Contact](https://nobusato.jp/en/contact?hsLang=en)

Views here are my own and don’t represent any organization I work or have worked for.

© 2026 Nobu Sato. All rights reserved.·[Privacy and disclaimer](https://nobusato.jp/en/privacy?hsLang=en)

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BreadcrumbList",
  "itemListElement" : [ {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://nobusato.jp/en",
    "name" : "Home",
    "position" : 1
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog",
    "name" : "Articles",
    "position" : 2
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/tag/launching-in-japan",
    "name" : "Launching in Japan",
    "position" : 3
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover",
    "name" : "59% of Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan Changed Heads, 2002-07",
    "position" : 4
  } ]
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover",
  "@type" : "WebPage",
  "about" : {
    "@type" : "Thing",
    "name" : "Launching in Japan"
  },
  "author" : {
    "@id" : "https://nobusato.jp/#person"
  },
  "description" : "A study of 554 established foreign subsidiaries in Japan found 59% changed their head in 2002-2007. After an expatriate head left, margins fell.",
  "inLanguage" : "en",
  "isPartOf" : {
    "@id" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog",
    "@type" : "Blog",
    "name" : "Articles"
  },
  "keywords" : "Launching in Japan",
  "name" : "59% of Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan Changed Heads, 2002-07",
  "url" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://nobusato.jp/#person",
  "@type" : "Person",
  "alternateName" : [ "佐藤伸明", "Nobu Sato", "左滕" ],
  "description" : "Japan market launches: organization, sales and technology",
  "knowsAbout" : [ "Japan market entry", "Organization design", "Talent acquisition", "Sales organization building", "Technology organization building", "Japanese labor law" ],
  "name" : "Nobu Sato",
  "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/in/realnobusato/", "https://x.com/nobusato5888" ],
  "url" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/profile"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Nobu Sato",
    "url" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/author/nobu-sato"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2026-11-12T05:56:10.333Z",
  "datePublished" : "2026-11-12T05:56:10.000Z",
  "headline" : "59% of Foreign Subsidiaries in Japan Changed Heads, 2002-07",
  "image" : [ "https://nobusato.jp/hubfs/covers-2026-10/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover-cover-en-2026-10.png" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://nobusato.jp/en/blog/japan-subsidiary-head-turnover",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://nobusato.jp/hubfs/seo/logo-nobusato-2026-10.png"
    },
    "name" : "nobusato.jp"
  }
}
```