Nobu Sato

One Company, Four Female Manager Ratios

Hitachi FY2025 female manager ratios: overseas 22.7%, group 17.4%, parent 8.9%, Japan 6.8%

Competitor analysis keeps running into a question that sounds simple: does this company have many women in management? Open the annual securities report Hitachi filed in June 2026 and the same table gives four answers: 17.4%, 22.7%, 8.9% and 6.8%.

None of them is wrong. They are the same measure counted over four different scopes.

Whose number is whose

Outside Japan (consolidated)22.7%Group, consolidated17.4%Hitachi, Ltd. (parent)8.9%Japan (consolidated)6.8%Source: Hitachi, Ltd., annual securities report, 157th term (FY2025), employee section

Fig. 1One securities report, one fiscal year, four female manager ratios. The two dark bars are the scopes people working in Japan actually sit in.

17.4% is the company and its group, the consolidated figure. Split out, consolidated subsidiaries outside Japan are at 22.7% and those in Japan at 6.8%. 8.9% is the filing company, Hitachi, Ltd. itself, calculated under the Act on Promotion of Women's Participation.

The same report lists domestic subsidiaries one by one. Several are at 0.0%; one reaches 26.0%.

So if a candidate in Japan asks whether Hitachi has many women managers, the relevant range is 6.8% to 8.9%, not 17.4%. If the question is about global promotion paths, 17.4% and 22.7% are closer. Which number is right depends on the question.

The company's own report: scope labeled, but scope inside the trend

0%5%10%15%includes scope change9.59.813.014.115.8Hitachi Group6.56.87.47.88.5Hitachi, Ltd.FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024Source: Hitachi Integrated Report 2025, data page

Fig. 2The Integrated Report 2025 shows both scopes side by side. The group line jumps from 9.8% to 13.0% in FY2022, and a footnote says the increase includes an expanded counting scope.

Hitachi's Integrated Report 2025 puts both scopes side by side. The group rose from 9.5% in FY2020 to 15.8% in FY2024; Hitachi, Ltd. from 6.5% to 8.5%. The scope is clearly labeled, and in that sense the numbers line up.

A footnote adds that the increase in women managers includes the effect of an expanded counting scope and changes in consolidated companies. The group line jumps in FY2022. How much of that jump is scope and how much is more women being promoted, the report does not separate.

Most companies give you only one number

Hitachi is the exception. PwC Japan analyzed securities reports for the year to March 2023 from 890 non-financial companies listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange Prime market with March year-ends. Of the 850 that disclosed a female manager ratio, 91% gave only an individual-company figure; 9% gave a consolidated one.

In most cases, then, the number in the securities report covers only the parent. A holding company may employ a few hundred people while the business sits in subsidiaries, and for companies with large overseas operations the gap between parent and group can be wide. Corporate websites, integrated reports and careers pages, meanwhile, often quote group or global figures. Put the two side by side without aligning scope and you reach the wrong conclusion.

A cross-check list

For competitor analysis and market mapping, these checks help:

  • The employee section of the securities report: first see whether a figure is for the filing company or consolidated, and whether Japan and overseas are split. Average age, tenure and salary are parent-only figures.
  • Integrated reports and sustainability data: find the scope and footnote next to each number, especially notes on expanded scope or changes in consolidated companies.
  • The MHLW database of companies promoting women's participation: individual-company figures, managers defined as section chief and above, with a stated date. Unlisted companies appear too, which fills gaps the securities reports leave.
  • Certifications such as Kurumin and Eruboshi: check against the ministry's list of certified companies, not a logo on a careers page.
  • Year and date: securities reports use fiscal year-end, the database often another date. Two numbers from different years cannot simply be subtracted.

The principle is the same as in the post on why most Japanese companies' financials are not public: when scopes do not match, mark the cell as a different scope rather than filling it in by inference.

First, I used only one company, Hitachi, because it discloses enough to show four scopes. That does not mean other companies show gaps this large, or that any Hitachi figure is a problem.

Second, the Integrated Report 2025 covers FY2024 and the securities report FY2025, so I have not compared the two sets directly.

Third, PwC's count is for the year to March 2023. More companies may disclose consolidated figures now.

In your own competitor table, which scope is the number in the women-in-management column?


Shorter notes that don't make it into a full article go on LinkedIn. Follow me there.

Writing about launching in Japan, in three languages.